Step Away From the Moon Rock…

NASA joins the ever-growing list of government agencies that just can’t resist the excessive use of police force. From the AP story:

Davis claims Armstrong gave the items to her husband, though the affidavit says the first man on the moon has previously told investigators he never gave or sold lunar material to anyone.

In follow-up phone conversations with a NASA agent, Davis acknowledged the rock was not sellable on the open market and fretted about an agent knocking on her door and taking the material, which she was willing to sell for “big money underground.”

“She must know that this is a questionable transaction because she used the term ‘black market,'” Agent Conley states in the search warrant.

Curiously, though, Davis agreed to sell the sample to NASA for a stellar $1.7 million. She said she wanted to leave her three children an inheritance and take care of her sick son.

NASA investigators then arranged the sting, where Conley met with Davis and her current husband at the Denny’s at Lake Elsinore in Riverside County.

Soon after settling into a booth, Davis said, she pulled out the moon sample and about half a dozen sheriff’s deputies and NASA investigators rushed into the eatery.

When officers in flack vests took a hold of her, the 4-foot-11 woman said she was so scared she lost control of her bladder and was taken outside to a parking lot, where she was questioned and detained for about two hours.

Okay, clearly this lady suspected she was probably sitting on hot Apollo memorabilia. But was it necessary to take her down with a half-dozen Deputy Dawgs in flak jackets? This was an old lady at Denny’s, not some meth dealer in the ‘hood. Were they afraid she was gonna go all ninja, whip out her dentures and kill somebody?

But hey, if the Dept. of Education can use SWAT to serve warrants for unpaid student loans, I guess that’s just the world we live in.

 

Just in Time for Deer Season

What every young man needs: a rifle that fires tactical nuclear warheads.

Hat tip: Field & Stream’s Gun Nuts.

Yet another product from our government’s golden age of ingenuity. Or something. In the meantime, I’m still craving this decidedly less elaborate firearm:

And as the tag line says, I can probably have only one…

Are You Smarter Than a Wall Street Occupier?

Judging by the results of this survey, I’d say your average single-celled organism might have more brain power.

This whole sorry movement is really just the end result of decades of undermining our education standards. Add to that far too many young people who go on to major in absolutely useless subjects only to end up saddled with massive debt and no job prospects. This quote from a NY Times story is priceless:

In Boston, a hub of colleges and universities, a higher education theme emerged among protesters. “What did I spend the last four years doing…Fluent in Mandarin and French and no one wants to go for that? And it’s like, now what?”

Yes, the economy’s in the tank. But jobs are not non-existent, and you might be more competitive if you’d majored in something useful instead of Medieval French Literature with a minor in Transgender Victim Studies. What stands out in the above piece is how many of them seem to be from the artsy-crafty crowd. Strangely, I don’t see many stories about newly-minted engineers being out of work. Check the websites of Boeing, Lockheed, SpaceX, etc. and you’ll find they’re still hiring in droves.

Look, my degree’s in English. I get it. I likewise didn’t give serious thought to what good it’d actually do for me in the marketplace since I was headed for the military. And that was 25 years ago, when the Reagan Boom was in full swing. When the economy is barely avoiding depression, employers can afford to be a lot more choosy. They have to be.

What’s sad is that this crowd just doesn’t get it. They don’t understand where their anger really needs to be focused because they’ve come up through a system that left them completely unprepared for reality.

I feel sorry for a lot of these people, seriously. This guy, not so much:

One Link to Rule Them All

Here’s a great New York Times story on how Amazon is disrupting traditional publishing by signing authors to their own imprints. From the article:

Amazon executives, interviewed at the company’s headquarters here, declined to say how many editors the company employed, or how many books it had under contract. But they played down Amazon’s power and said publishers were in love with their own demise.

“It’s always the end of the world,” said Russell Grandinetti, one of Amazon’s top executives. “You could set your watch on it arriving.”

He pointed out, though, that the landscape was in some ways changing for the first time since Gutenberg invented the modern book nearly 600 years ago. “The only really necessary people in the publishing process now are the writer and reader,” he said.

Author Michael Stackpole has more: Is Amazon the Sauron of Publishing?

Publishers really can’t ignore that this is a shot across their bows—though I imagine they will. Just the fact that Amazon pays on a monthly basis makes authors look on them favorably. Their willingness to promote is another plus. The fact that they’re willing to let authors publish what they want when they want, regardless of whether or not a committee thinks it will be a blockbuster, is a third factor in their favor.

Plus this perspective on fears of Amazon becoming a monopoly:

For authors, Amazon (and electronic publishing), looks very good. We earn 70% of a retail price we set, and we get the money in sixty days. Amazon spends a lot of money convincing people to buy empty boxes and allows me to supply the stuff they’ll put in those boxes. While some might fear that Amazon—once it establishes its monopoly—will cut the pay rate or otherwise upset the apple-cart, I believe that worry is premature. Amazon’s plan for complete vertical integration requires the compliance of authors. They need what we supply.

Emphasis mine. Not much more to say here, the links are worth reading in full.

The Pain Train is Coming…

And it’s headed for the publishing companies. At The Bookseller, an interesting report from Publishers Launch Frankfurt:

Robert Gottlieb, chairman of the US literary agency Trident Media Group [pictured], said publishers were still fixed in their traditional models. “American publishers have to get beyond the point when they are doing it the same way, over and over again,” he said. “It means cutting overheads, and changing their dynamics, and welcoming as opposed to resisting or being frightened of this new e-book arena.”

He said publishers should “embrace” the changes, and “then they’ll be able to look at what they are paying their authors in a knowledgeable way, and we will then see the rate moving up”. Gottlieb warned that new players such as Amazon had no such constraints and were “offering a higher e-book rate, and advances that are comparable with what others publishers are willing to pay”. He warned that publishers’ grip on the business was “starting to change in favour of the author”. He added: “Publishers are frightened to death of the e-book market, because they see the opportunity for authors, that they did not have before.”

Emphasis mine.

An attitude I’d heard expressed at a writer’s conference is that we shouldn’t base our decisions on the success stories of self-pubbers, because they’re outliers. Their success is the exception, not the rule. It’s serendipity and nothing else.

All things being equal, sure, I get that. But all things are not equal. Isn’t success in traditional publishing just as much of an exception? Isn’t it just as much from luck as anything else?

Think about it. You spend years pouring your soul into that first novel – or at least you’d better be. Then, you spend weeks researching agents and crafting the perfect query letter. This is followed by more weeks, stretching into months, of sending those queries out in the hopes of getting their attention. And if you’re smart, you’ve tailored each one of those letters for each agent.

A few get favorable attention. After months of watching your email and waiting by the phone, you finally get picked up. Hallelujah!

But you still have a lot more work ahead in order to make your manuscript presentable. At which point the process repeats itself once they start pitching your book.

In my case, I made it through the first couple of steps and then the agency that wanted my work went and opened up their own e-pub business. So I wrote them off, since they apparently couldn’t grasp the whole “conflict of interest” thing. And this was a fairly big agency.

The whole experience felt way too much like high school dating. And I don’t buy the “if you can’t get a deal, your writing just isn’t ready” argument any more than I believed I wasn’t good enough for the Popular Crowd in school. When I see some of the horrible writing that made it through the traditional process, it becomes very obvious that most of that process is about personal taste and little else.

And for the icing on the cake: at the end of all this you get an advance that in most cases is not enough to live on. But doesn’t that book look nice on the shelf at Barnes & Noble?

Screw that. Success found on someone else’s terms isn’t real in my book.

So how is that any different than the traditional route? With all of the middlemen and management layers involved before a finished product hits the shelves, how is that not any less dependent on luck?

The common denominator is quality writing. You might sell a few crappy ebooks on Amazon, but you’re not going to make a living from it. And you certainly won’t land an agent and a Big Six deal with crap. But if you write well and can tell a good story, your chances are better now than ever before.

It used to be that publishers groomed promising writers through the “pulp” system to prepare them for the big leagues. Seems to me that’s what is happening now with Amazon. Their latest imprint, 47North, is a perfect example. The ebook marketplace is their farm team.

It’s a great time to be a new author. I’m enjoying the freedom to approach writing as an independent businessman, instead of begging for attention from strangers whose tastes may or may not mesh with mine.

But make no mistake: it’s a lot of work. Even with hard work, it may not happen at all. I have no illusions about that. But getting a pub deal the old-fashioned way carries the same risks. So the question is, which approach do you believe will yield the best return on your investment?

Hmm…that sounds almost like…a business decision!

A Nuke Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry

If only that were so, but apparently The One felt the need to apologize for dropping the big ones that ended WWII. Fortunately the Japanese saw the folly of it and headed him off at the pass. You’d think they’d have been the first ones to be okay with it, but no dice.

I spent a good deal of time in Japan as a young Marine, and was able to visit Hiroshima. It was an amazing city, and the memorial gardens were sobering. Seeing the remnants of such violent history up close should make anyone with a brain in their heads think about the consequences of war.

In no way does that mean we shouldn’t have done it. Truman’s decision saved millions on both sides. Anyone who says otherwise is willfully ignorant of the realities of the period. Consider we had to nuke them – twice – before they  finally surrendered.

It also established the United States as one country you absolutely did not want to screw with. We’ve sadly frittered away that legacy over the intervening decades.

One of the memorial’s main halls held an enormous guestbook for visitors to sign and leave their thoughts. It was full of the predictable twaddle about tolerance and world peace and how-terrible-this-must-never-happen-again-please-forgive-us flapdoodle. It was thoroughly dismaying.

So what was my entry?

“They started it.”

Nazis in Spaaace!

I really need to get out more. This trailer has apparently been around since 2008:

Because of course it makes sense that the Nazis went into exile on the far side of the moon! How silly for us to have chased them down in South America!

Makes about as much sense as the Transformers 3 premise did, I guess. Wonder if they’ll be able to get a cameo from Buzz Aldrin too?

More about this extremely weird production at their website. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Luna

These Two Neutrinos Walk Into a Bar…

The estimable Charles Krauthammer explains that light-speed thingy much better than I ever could. At National Review Online:

Einstein’s predictions about how time slows and mass increases as one approaches the speed of light have been verified by a mountain of experimental evidence. As velocity increases, mass approaches infinity and time slows to zero, making it progressively and, ultimately, infinitely difficult to achieve light speed. Which is why nothing does. And nothing ever has.

Until two weeks ago Thursday.

That’s when the results were announced. To oversimplify grossly: If the Gran Sasso scientists had a plate to record the arrival of the neutrinos and a super-powerful telescope to peer (through the Alps!) directly into the lab in Geneva from which they were being fired, the Gran Sasso guys would have “heard” the neutrinos clanging against the plate before they observed the Geneva guys squeeze the trigger on the neutrino gun.

Sixty nanoseconds before, to be precise. Wrap your mind around that one.

It’s as if someone told you that yesterday at drive time Topeka was released from Earth’s gravity. These things don’t happen. Natural laws don’t just expire between shifts at McDonald’s.

They certainly don’t at any McDonald’s I’ve ever been to. By all means, read the whole thing. And hold on to your hat.

UPDATE: An opposing view from someone with a bit more direct experience in such matters.

UPDATE THE SECOND: It’s an error, which can be accounted for by special relativity according to MIT. Supposedly they’re pretty good at this physics stuff…